" Earmark reform will help eliminate wasteful spending. Taxpayer dollars should be spent wisely or not at all. That's why it's necessary for the number and cost of earmarks be reduced, that their origin and purposes be transparent, and that they be included in the text of the bills voted upon by the Congress and presented to the President.
On Tuesday, President Bush will issue an Executive Order directing Federal agencies to ignore any future earmark that is not voted on and included in a law approved by Congress. This will effectively end the common practice of concealing earmarks in so-called report language instead of placing them in the actual text of the bill. This means earmarks will be subject to votes, which will better expose them to the light of day and help constrain excessive and unjustified spending.
- The Executive Order will provide that with regard to all future appropriations laws and other legislation enacted into law, executive agencies will not commit, obligate, or expend funds on the basis of earmarks from any non-statutory source, including requests included in congressional committee reports or other congressional documents, or communications from or on behalf of Members of Congress, or any other non-statutory source, except when required by law, or when an agency itself decides that a project or other transaction has merit under statutory criteria or other merit-based decision-making.
- The Supreme Court says report language is not legally binding. The U.S. Supreme Court has made clear that committee reports and other legislative history materials do not bind executive agencies."
- Do you reckon it's possible that folks will remember Conservatism before the November elections?
1 comment:
So where do we find a moderate with conservative leanings this go round?
GW was to be a uniter, gain the line item veto and end Lobbyist control in washington. Last night he said the uniter thing can't be done, the line item veto is forgotten and he's managed to raise $60m for Republican candidates that want it at the Congressional level.
Slim pickins'
We can get inspiration with no teeth and higher taxes on the left or more hollow promise with a side of (an even bigger lack of) business as usual from the right.
2008: so many choices, with no real choice.
Are you better off than 4 years ago, no.
Will you be better off in 4 years, no.
Could we be worse off than we are, yes.
Post a Comment